A Gen X Perspective on the U.S. Presidential Election of 2016

I've always argued that generation lines are fuzzy (see one post at https://goo.gl/DPruQP for more).  At best, generations describe more of a common mindset.  The Wall Street Journal reports (see http://on.wsj.com/29CoIAC for the article) some commentary by Neil Howe, who along with co-author William Strauss, used the term "Millennials" in their book "Generations: The History of America's Future 1584 to 2069."  By Mr. Howe's estimate, Gen X is a group defined by parental divorce and indifference, and the date ranges in birth from 1961 to 1981.

"The old joke is that it [Gen X] was the first generation born when people took pills NOT to have children," he said. "Much of the culture turned actively anti-child.  The giant genre of the 60s and 70s was child-devil horror movies."  The U.S. fertility rate hit a low thanks to the intro of the birth control pill in the 1960's, plus the divorce rate accelerated to unprecedented rates, so children born into that era have been described as one of the least-nurtured groups in American history.

But Gen X doesn't wallow in self-pity as Baby Boomers and Millennials sometimes do (listen to some Boomer music or watch some of their movies if you need proof), rather Xers grew up fending for themselves, and learned that the ONLY institution we could depend on was ourselves.  Hence, long ago, Gen Xers developed an independent spirit and can-do attitude, and became more than capable of taking care of ourselves.  Boomer parents didn't do a great job looking after Xers as kids, and government was close to useless with an ineptitude caused by a complete lack of funding and public support.

Less anyone get the wrong idea, that's not to say that Gen X is explicitly anti-government, but our perspective most visibly manifests itself in outright Gen X hostility towards government infringement upon people's individual rights.  That's one reason why Gen X has led the way (and become quite good at navigating how to succeed) with issues like bans on same-sex marriage, restrictions on voting rights or police brutality going unpunished.  This means that not only did Gen X make marriage equality happen nationwide (Jim Obergefell, whose name is associated with the supreme court case that made it legal nationwide is a Gen Xer who was born in 1967), but they also see right-wing attacks on the Black Lives Matter movement as oppressive, and Gen X has learned to successfully use the courts to overturn many attempts at voter restrictions that Republicans have implemented.

Voting restrictions have lost in the courts in North Carolina, Wisconsin, Texas, Indiana and elsewhere, although its unclear whether all are complying.  The Republican party has been under a U.S. Supreme Court consent decree in place since 1982 because of previous voter intimidation efforts in New Jersey back in 1981.  Donald J. Trump has been actively encouraging vigilantism among his supporters by claiming the elections are "rigged" against his candidacy.  The Trump campaign's questionable "poll-monitoring" vigilantism (most often targeting racial minorities who tend to vote for Democrats), with supporters who call themselves "vote protectors" complete with phony, semi-official looking I.D. Badges that could be generated by vigilantes online at websites like stopthesteal.org which now threatens to extend the original decree against the Republican National Committee for another 8 years because it may held in contempt of that decree.  Slate is reporting (see http://slate.me/2fa0JMJ for more) that on October 1, 2016, U.S. District Judge John Michael Vazquez demanded that the Republican National Committee (RNC) provide certain documents in 24 hours.

Anyway, back to the actual campaigns.  The appeal of the campaign slogan "Make America Great Again" from Republican Presidential nominee Donald J. Trump means absolutely nothing to kids who grew up when Xers did (or later), which could be a major problem for his candidacy.  Zilch.  Nada.  Zip.  It's all just empty words that doesn't mean anything.  Make no mistake, this is really a generational perspective, only the Baby Boomers-led campaigns don't quite know what to make of it, but its clear that Gen X and Millennials aren't quite necessarily rallying around that message.

For Gen X kids, most of whom were born in the late 1960's and 1970's, Mr. Trump couldn't have chosen a more irrelevant slogan, so he shouldn't be surprised if few of us are rallying around his candidacy.

I was born in April 1969.  The Baby Boomer Summer of Love and Woodstock all took place a few months afterwards.  The joke among many Gen X kids is that we weren't at Woodstock, but at least a few of us were likely conceived there!  But Gen X doesn't look back at those days with reverence, but a sense of having missed the big party.  We Gen Xers didn't get to celebrate, but many of us feel like we got stuck with the hangover.  Gen Xers were raised in the least child-friendly era in U.S. history.  Not only did more than half our parents get divorced when we were kids, but most of our mothers entered the workforce even if they didn't get divorced.  The latter issue wasn't completely their fault.  The OPEC oil embargo played a role, as did stagflation, but the point is that our childhoods were probably best remembered by waiting in long gas lines and inflation gobbling up our allowances so it wasn't worth as much a week later.  Oh yeah, and the Iranian revolution in 1979, during an era when America was making enemies around the world.  We also grew up amid racial riots, following the Stonewall riots and a "white flight" out of the cities, as well as hearing endless stories about how horrible Vietnam was, yet we have zero first-hand knowledge of any of that.  We don't understand what you're talking about when you say "make America great again".

That said, our parents were smart enough not to implement another draft, although that didn't stop them from sending troops to Grenada, Kuwait, Iraq and Afghanistan.  While Boomers had free love in the 1960's, when we Gen Xers came of age, we were taught that HIV could kill us, but what did they try to teach us?  Abstinence, like that's ever worked.  Making matters worse, they screwed us when came to education financing.  Gone were the days of being able to attend college tuition-free in some Western states.  Oh, and because so many Baby Boomers defaulted on their student loan debts, Congress re-classified student loan debts the only type of debt that could NEVER be charged-off in a bankruptcy court -- thanks for that, Boomers.  Once again, you got the party, but left the hangover for your kids.

I don't think there's really all that much from the past that Gen X kids really want to return to.  We grew up watching TV shows from the early 1970's fail at racial integration, at least initially. From our perspective, those days are best left in the past.

I acknowledge that neither political candidate is exactly loved, in fact, both the candidate the  GOP nominated and the nominee that Democrats elected BOTH have the highest disapproval rates in the history of Presidential elections.  Mrs. Clinton should not presume we are "with her" even if she is preferable to her opponents.  Both candidates also represent only the Baby Boomer generation of politicians, which is a problem.  While we may yet see other Boomer candidates in coming elections, their days of leading the country are thankfully nearing their natural end, and that won't happen a moment too soon from many Gen Xers' perspective.  Politico recently observed that (see http://politi.co/1K9zu1t for the article) Baby Boomers in Congress have given us nothing but years and years of gridlock; yet research shows Gen Xers will be more productive.  It's time to step aside Boomers.  Let Gen X lawmakers like Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin (a lesbian) or New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker (an African-American) have a chance to change a Congress best known for a culture wars and gridlock into something better as a "gift" from Baby Boomers' time in power.  We want a government that works for the people who elected them, not special interests who bought and paid for many of your campaigns.

The Boomer experience at the gas pump in 1960 vs. the Xer experience in 1973

Important Points of Comparison between Baby Boomers and Generation X:

Baby Boomers	Gen X
Rosa Parks' refusal to move to back of bus	Jonestown mass suicide
First nuclear power plant	Three Mile Island, Exxon Valdez
Kennedy elected, then assassinated	Watergate scandal, Nixon resignation
Cuban Missile Crisis	Iranian hostage crisis
First moon landing	Space Shuttle Challenger disaster
Stonewall riots	Gay Marriage bans ruled unconstitutional
Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed	Rodney King beating

Does Anyone Remember Tabitha Soren?

For those of you with short memories, or were simply too young to remember it because you were still in diapers at the time, Tabitha Soren began her celebrity career as a 19-year old NYU student featured in a video from The Beastie Boys "(You Gotta) Fight For Your Right (To Party!)", a lame video from a one-hit-wonder back in the late 1980's, although she became much better known as a reporter for what was formerly known as MTV News as the face of MTV's "Choose or Lose" campaign.

The National Geographic channel, which ran a multi-part series on Generation X relatively recently, had a relevant clip on MTV News Rocks the Vote which is worth watching (see below), or at https://youtu.be/ehvnzfHh2n0:



Technically, the MTV election campaign began a couple of years earlier and was known as "Rock the Vote" with TV commercials from Madonna and other popular figures.  Check out this commercial below, or by visiting https://youtu.be/Wh6hesHk6yE:



MTV soon realized that their network had some relevance on the elections, and what started as a few commercials morphed in subsequent years, becoming "Choose or Lose" when Tabitha Soren (she was likely named after the daughter of the character that actress Elizabeth Montgomery made famous in the smash sitcom from the late 1960's-early 1970's "Bewitched", catch my posts at https://goo.gl/olfrdW and https://goo.gl/iKsTG for more) became MTV's primary reporter on the elections at that time.  I uncovered a clip on YouTube which provides a flashback of some of that coverage (which can be seen at https://youtu.be/QQyuJ4t8kRw).

However, the MTV "Choose or Lose" campaign with Ms. Soren officially began in 1992, just as Generation X was becoming a key part of the American electorate.  (In 1992, for example, I was 23 years old and living on my own in the Bay Area, but very much ready to exercise my voting rights.)  Famously, at a town hall symposium sponsored by MTV that year, then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton was asked whether he'd ever tried marijuana and he famously replied, "I didn't inhale".  Whether that brought masses of young people out to vote isn't very well documented as Tabitha seems suggest today, but it seemed to be a clear sign that the era of total Baby Boomer dominance of the elections was thankfully coming to an end.)

These days, Soren is a married mother of three kids, and she works professionally in photography.  But on August 18, 2016, she re-emerged in the world of politics with a contribution to opinion section of The New York Times entitled "Hillary Clinton and the Ghosts of MTV" (see the piece at http://nyti.ms/2b5OUGs for more).

Frankly, I was a bit puzzled on the message Tabitha was trying to communicate (she was a reporter who was on MTV back in the day, never really a journalist, folks) in her opinion piece.

She does say "The pretense of a lot of political coverage today is that it aims to improve and edify our civic life. The reality is that it's just whoring for attention" and I generally agree, but I don’t think the same is true for all candidates, just Mr. Trump.  For example, in addition to Mrs. Clinton, former governors Gary Johnson and his running-mate Bill Weld were (are) somewhat viable Libertarian candidates who aren't "whoring for attention" as Mr. Trump seems to be.

Although these days, Bill Clinton's wife Hillary is running for President of the United States, and seems to have a decent chance of winning because her opponent is a former reality show star who largely refuses to stay on script even though he's no longer running in the Republican party primaries speaking to voters who like his racist, misogynistic, xenophobic message, therefore he should not presume the rest of the electorate will follow his nativist and frequently racist messages that remain too short on the kinds of details that intelligent voters like me want and deserve (also, why is he the ONLY Presidential candidate in many decades who refuses to release his tax returns?).

But to suggest that elections are entertainment as Tabitha is suggests to me that she chose wisely by pursuing photography, since her coverage of the election issues in 2016 doesn’t really rock my vote!